So far we have not found an actual alternative power source other than what has already been discovered (hydro-electricity, nuclear power, fossil fuels, solar power etc.). The new sources of power are all power vectors (resultant from indirect use of one kind of power already in use. Is there some kind of power supply that we haven’t found yet that will carry us into the future? Gravitational wave energy? Nucleonic resonance?
Posted in Wind Power
Tagged alternative power, energy, fossil fuels, future, Gravitational, gravitational wave, hydro electricity, kind, nuclear power, Nucleonic, power, power source, power supply, RESONANCE, Solar Power, source, sources of power, supply, there some kind, use, vectors, WAVE, wave energy
I’m interested, especially if you work/invest in this area and have a good idea about what is going on in the industry, mostly U.S. Who are the major players? Where is the best area? Does it have a future? If so, what obstacles must it overcome?
Posted in Water Power
Tagged Area, future, IDEA, industry, obstacles, power, S. Who, wind, Wind Power
My soul is is sold on dvd,cd,and internet.Its not fair the celebrities don’t share.I should be over a multi-trillionaire! I don’t dare them to not share.Its unfair.I will claim all out war fare for those who don’t share.I hope they are not scared since nobody close to me cares because I make the future.I am in a controlled environment.We all are in my brain.)Me,my wingman stares at the money not there in 2006.I make all tv shows,commercials,design everything,make,produce, create people.I have too much power and alot of energy.I am the source with too much force.I control people without noone knowing.Everyone is equal.Will religion give me my money?The world is divided by religion.I am the man in command with demands.There could be car free accident days,but not until people believe me and I will make sure.I am on every station just working “through” people.I am “cumming in all signals.I am supreme being.I freestyle mother nature as well as celebrities.100% free.I will always be advance
(April 16, 2008) Christina Archer, consulting assistant professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford University, discusses the importance of win power in a clean and renewable future. The Energy Seminar meets weekly during the academic year. For a list of upcoming talks, visit the events page at the Woods Institute for the Environment website. Stanford University www.stanford.edu Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford: woods.stanford.edu Christina Archer www.stanford.edu Stanford University Channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com
HOPE FOR HUMANITY Credit: www.youtube.com nanoholdings.com – Justin Hall-Tipping CEO of “Nanoholdings” Explains how nanotechnology is set to change the future of energy and replace fossil and nuclear fuels Below is an excerpt from: nanoholdings.com Nanoholdings is a team of scientists, investors and innovators working at the cutting-edge of nanotechnology to develop solutions to the world’s growing energy problems. Working in partnership with the world’s best universities we develop products and companies that will revolutionize the way we use and generate energy. Two things stand out about us — we focus exclusively on nanotechnology-based energy solutions and we work at the very cutting-edge of nano-energy research. Our extensive network of leading scientists in the nanotechnology field are central to our work – scientists based at eminent universities around the world, who are working at the coal-face of nano-energy research to seek out alternative solutions for how we generate, transmit, store and use energy. We support and guide their research, transforming breakthroughs into viable solutions — products to revolutionize the way we use and generate energy
Generator defeats Lenz’s law.
fusion power plants are renewable and safe energy sources that does not cause much/any harm to the environment, unlike many other forms of renewable energy e.g. wind (damages scenery) and hydro-electric (flood area). Fusion technology also promises high energy out puts once it is perfected (major drawback of solar panels) fusion reactors are relatively safe to operate since the fusion reaction is very fragile and any irregularities will cause it to stop ( unlike nuclear reactors). so, are there any drawbacks to fusion technology?
Tagged damages, drawback, energy, energy sources, environment, flood, flood area, Fusion, fusion power plants, fusion reaction, fusion reactors, fusion technology, future, harm, high energy, Hydro electric, irregularities, nuclear reactors, power, renewable energy, safe energy, scenery, solar panels, technology, wind
Leah was veeeery hungover one day, and decided to drink more beer. This resulted in her getting drunk again. And this is what happened after. She was going on about random things, so I decided to record her. It’s pretty quiet, and she mumbles, so here’s what she says: Josh: What’s gonna happen in the future? Leah: No, I can’t! Alex: What kind of cars will there be? Leah: I dunno. They’ll run on water. But then we’ll have to melt all the goddamn ice caps in order to get the cars to run. Josh: But what about global warming? Won’t that do the melting of the polar ice caps for us? Leah: Well, yeah but you know, global warming isn’t exactly you know, environmentally friendly. Krystle: yeaaah Alex says something.. Leah: Yeah but that’s what I’m saying, like, like people need to, to, Alex: Maybe we should make them run on wind power.. Leah: Nooo. No. Krystle: Solar.. Leah: People need to. Yeah! The suns not gonna burn out anytime soon. Like, the earth will explode before the sun burns out and if the sun explodes then we die anyways. So. It’s fine. It’s fine. We’ll just live a life of, of solar powered vehicles but the problem is that we need to find a way Krystle: to store it Leah: yes! Alex: something about solar panels Leah: Alex you’re a genius. We invented solar energy. Okay but no, we need to invent like.. Alex: No, no we didn’t invent solar energy, we invented the apparatus to harness it. We didn’t invent the sun Leah. Leah: well no, well no, we, we, we did it though. So …